Politics Vs. Biology
 
Fishing For Freedom
We are a non-user group specific organization that seeks to protect Florida's environment, people, and economy through responsible scientific, sociological, and ecological management.
 
 
The Net Case Appeal to the Supreme Court
 
 
Fishing For Freedom's Group Picture at the First DCA
 
 
Manatee County
 
 
The Cortez Commercial Fishing Festival! A Smashing Success
 
 
Donations For The Fight Page
 
 
Supporters of Fishing For Freedom - They Support Us - Let's Support Them
 
 
Fishing For Freedom Chapters and Members Pictures
 
 
October 22, 2013 THE JUDGE RULES - A MUST READ
 
 
Legal Reasoning For Overturning The 2" Rule on Seine Nets that the CCA Does Not Want the Public to Know
 
 
September 14th Update: Right Before Judge Fulford and the Media's Eyes and TV Cameras - The FWC Lies Are Exposed
 
 
Judge Fulford Fishes For The Truth; Tells The FWC And Glogau That She Is Going Fishing With Us
 
 
Updated 4/15/2012: Your One Stop For FFF Reader Submitted YouTube Videos and 11 FFF Videos
 
 
March 14th, 2012 --- Resolution Number 4 And Counting
 
 
February 4th, Dixie County Resolution on Fishing Nets
 
 
February 1, 2012 Collier County Resolution On FWC Fishing Nets
 
 
February 1, 2012 Wakulla County Resolution On Nets
 
 
Need a laugh? Watch this factual FWC Court Video
 
 
February 7th , 2010 - Brand New YouTube Videos Submitted From Allen3200
 
 
4/18 Follow-up FACTS to the post above.The CCA Symbol Exposed
 
 
Posted 11/22 Mr. Osteen's Remembrance Card
 
 
5/08: 90 year old Johnny Osteen's case
 
 
Pictures of FWC Professionalism at work on 91 Year Old Mr. Osteen
 
 
Nov. 14... Can You Believe This? Sansom Reappointed After Telling Board Members Under His Rule Not To Cooperate With State Investigators About Disappearing Money
 
 
A Heartwarming,1939 Memory of Cast Netting Mullet
 
 
The Simple, Accurate Way to Measure a Commercial Fishing Net
 
 
Faces of a Fishing Village
A tribute to the men and women of America's working waterfronts
 
 
Added July 18 ... How the FWC was formed and what you may not know
 
 
DCA Rules FWC Can Not Be Challenged In Court
 
 
Video! FWC's Lies, Refusal to Provide Due Process and Arrogance Exposed at 1st DCA Hearing
 
 
FMP/FWC Netted Dolphin Fraud Parts 1 & 2
 
 
A Crabbing Family Wants You to Know
 
 
FWC/FWRI/Fishing For Freedom 500 Square Foot of Mesh Area Net Test Data
 
 
Protest Articles
 
 
Full Moon Summer Solstice Mullet Madness
 
 
Expose' #2 The Turtle Deception Revealed
 
 
"Rally in Tally" Pics
 
 
Van Lewis Fillets The Net Limitation Act
 
 
Contact Your Senators & Representatives
 
 
Meet Christina Johnson of our West Coast Office
 
 
Our N, S, and W Headquarters
 
 
The Marvin Thomas FWC Abuse Case
 
 
Abuse: 2 Down 3 to Go. See end of story
 
 
Updated (One small portion) 06/12/2010 - FWC Abuse of VP
 
 
FWC Abuse of Charles Beckham
 
 
Join Fishing For Freedom
 
 
The Limited Net Fishing Amendment
 
 

Added July 18 ... How the FWC was formed and what you may not know

-and what you don't know may hurt you. As the recreational industry is only beginning to discover. Since the "infamous net ban," the commercial industry has been severely mismanaged... Now the Commission is beginning to destroy the recreational industry.


From the Archives of Southeastern Fisheries, Courtesy of Executive Director Robert P. Jones.

December 1997 Hotlines Online Issue: CONSTITUTIONAL REVISON COMMISSION AIMS TO RESTRUCTURE FISHERIES

The Constitutional Revision Commission (CRC) is in the final stage of developing language to submit to the voters unifying the Marine Fisheries Commission(MFC) with the Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (GFFC). The unification would also bring in all other bureaus / divisions allowing the new “Super Commission” to have ultimate authority “with respect to” all fish and wildlife in the state. The Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP)Division of Marine Resources would be the first to be abolished or transferred which includes the research buildings, equipment and staff.. The shellfish bureau and the Florida Marine Patrol would also exit the DEP. Most current and former MFC members favor the unification as it removes any oversight by an elected official and gives the “Super Commission” total control of all the fish & wildlife in Florida and in federal waters adjacent to Florida in many instances. The MFC dislikes bringing their rules before the Cabinet for approval, but that’s the only check and balance there is other than the Administrative Procedures Act. CRC Commissioner Clay Henderson, CEO of the Florida Audubon Society and a former Volusia County Commissioner, has stated that he has no ax to grind with the commercial fishermen and is trying to develop language that would bring some consensus to the issue. CRC member James Harold Thompson, former Speaker of the House, objected to the proposal being voted on at the November 14th CRC meeting on the Florida Senate floor stressing that due process, at least as it pertains to marine fisheries,should be guided by the Administrative Procedures Act so that citizens could have the maximum amount of input and participation. The final vote will occur either in December or January. 22 of the 37 members of the CRC must concur to put the issue on the ballot. Concurrently, the Florida Supreme Court has before it a challenge to the proposed Unification Movement and their ruling would certainly clarify where everyone is on this issue. If this Unification is accomplished,it will have more effect on the fishing industry of Florida than anything else that has ever occurred, including the infamous net ban.

January 1998 Hotlines Online Issue: SFA CHALLENGES BALLOT SUMMARY SUCCESSFULLY

Southeastern Fisheries Association challenged the petition supported by a variety of anti-commercial fishing groups including the Florida Audubon Society, Coastal Conservation Association, Florida Wildlife Federation, Florida League of Anglers, EarthJustice Legal Defense Fund, Sierra Club, and the Fish & Wildlife Conservation Committee, which would have combined the Florida Marine Fisheries Commission with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. On January 8, 1998, the Florida Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Association’s challenge. The Justices said in their Opinion, that “ as in A s k e w , the problem “lies not with what the summary says, but, rather with what it does not say”. I d . At 156. The summary does not explain to the reader that the power to regulate marine life lies solely with the legislature, which has delegated that power to not only the Marine Fisheries Commission but also the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Agriculture. Though the summary states that the purpose of the amendment is to “unify” the Marine Fisheries Commission with the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, these two entities do not share the same status. Despite the common label “commission”, the former is a legislative creation while the latter enjoys independent constitutional stature. Thus the proposed amendment does not unify the two so much as it strips the legislature of its exclusive power to regulate marine life and grants it to a Constitutional entity. The summary does not sufficiently inform the public of this transfer of power. Accordingly, because the ballot summary does not meet the requirements of section 101.161, the title, summary and proposed text must be stricken from the ballot. It is so ordered.”

January 1998 Hotlines Online Issue: UNIFICATION OF GAME & FISH AND MFC PASSES REVISION COMMISSION

On January 12, the Florida Constitutional Revision Commission (CRC), in a 24-0 vote, decided to include the unification of the Game & Freshwater Fish Commission and the Marine Fisheries Commission on the November ballot despite the Supreme Court ruling, outlined in the previous article. At this point the CRC will have to write another ballot summary, which CANNOT be challenged. On the motion of Clay Henderson, CEO for Florida Audubon and a voting member of the CRC, the issue was steamrolled to passage. The unification places a whole class of citizens outside the normal protection of due process and the new due process will only be that which is established by four (Today it's seven. Addition from FFF) appointed commissioners. If such a blatant attack were perpetrated on any other class of citizens other than commercial fishermen, the media would be raising all kinds of hell but in this instance they seem to be all for it. The only hope the fishermen have lies with the federal courts.

Thank you for the submission Mr. Jones! FFF


Text-only version of this page  |  Edit this page  |  Manage website  |  Website design: 2-minute-website.com